Yes! Most of the cases where people have resorted to surgery, the laser would have dealt with it easily!
But I have noticed that masters who support the surgical method present laser removal in a negative light. They say it is expensive, time-consuming and dangerous. At the same time, they show the works of grief-masters who spoil the reputation of the procedure.
The client has two options: either to lie on the surgical table, or "definitely" get complications from the laser. In the first case, at least there is a guarantee that the tattoo or PMU will be removed, and quickly and without fuss.
Speed - this is, of course, good. But is it worth paying for quick tattoo removal with scars on the body?